How We Score

Our Scoring
Methodology

Every score on Check Supplement follows the same rigorous framework. Here's exactly how we evaluate ingredients and products.

Our Philosophy

We built our scoring system around one principle: human perception matters more than math. A score of 7 should feel like "good" to anyone who sees it. A score of 5 should feel like "below average." Our system is calibrated to match how humans naturally interpret numbers.

Score Interpretation Guide

9-10
Exceptional - Proven excellence, gold standard evidence
8-8.9
Excellent - Very good, strong evidence base
7-7.9
Very Good - Worth buying, solid research support
6-6.9
Decent - Has some issues but not terrible
5-5.9
Below Average - Significant problems
<5
Avoid - Safety issues, scams, or waste of money

Ingredient Scoring

Our "Laid-Back Doctor" scoring approach starts from the assumption that most supplements are "probably fine" and adjusts based on evidence quality and safety.

Base Score: 7

We start every ingredient at 7 (Good). Most supplements have some evidence of benefit and are generally safe. From there, we adjust up or down.

Bonuses (Add Points)

  • +2Essential nutrient addressing a common deficiency (Vitamin D, Magnesium)
  • +1Clear, validated mechanism of action understood by science
  • +1Gold standard evidence (Creatine, Omega-3, Vitamin D, etc.)

Penalties (Subtract Points)

  • -1Unclear mechanism - we don't know how it works
  • -1 to -3Safety concerns - interactions, side effects, or contraindications
  • -1Overhyped - Tribulus, homeopathic doses, marketing-driven claims

Product Scoring v5.0

Products are scored using a multi-factor formula that considers efficacy, purpose alignment, formulation intelligence, and label transparency.

Universal Score Formula

45%Efficacy (clinical dose percentages)
25%Purpose Alignment (ingredients match stated goal)
25%Formulation Intelligence (forms, synergies, conflicts)
5%Label Clarity (proprietary blend transparency)

Efficacy Analysis

We compare each ingredient's dose to clinical research standards. A product with all ingredients at 80%+ of clinical doses gets top marks. Underdosed products get penalized accordingly.

Form Quality

Premium forms (Magnesium Glycinate, Methylfolate) get bonuses. Poor forms (Magnesium Oxide, Folic Acid) get penalties. We track bioavailability multipliers for each form.

Synergy Detection

We identify beneficial pairings (Vitamin D + K2, Iron + Vitamin C) and conflicts (Calcium + Iron, Zinc + Copper). Smart combinations boost scores; conflicts reduce them.

Proprietary Blend Penalty

Products hiding doses behind "proprietary blends" get automatic score reductions. Full transparency is rewarded; opacity is penalized.

Our Data Sources

We integrate data from 10 authoritative sources to provide comprehensive, accurate information.

PubMed/NIH
Peer-reviewed clinical studies
Semantic Scholar
Meta-analyses and systematic reviews
ClinicalTrials.gov
Dosage data from registered trials
SUPP.AI (Allen Institute)
59,000+ drug-supplement interactions
NIH DSLD
Label verification (136K products)
USDA FoodData
Food equivalents and nutrient data
OpenFDA
Recalls and adverse events
ChEMBL/RxNorm
Name normalization and synonyms

See Our Methodology In Action

Browse our ingredient database or analyze your supplement stack.