Back to About
Editorial Standards

How We Ensure
Accuracy & Trust

Our content is researched and written by nutrition and health experts, fact-checked against peer-reviewed sources, and reviewed by credentialed professionals including Registered Dietitians and Pharmacists. We maintain editorial independence and do not accept payment for reviews.

Expert Team
Credentialed Professionals
Research-First
Evidence-Based
Peer-Reviewed
Clinical Sources
Independent
No Pay-for-Reviews

Meet the Founder

NK

Norans Kepals

Founder & Independent Supplement Expert

Norans founded Check Supplement to cut through the noise in the supplement industry. As an independent expert with years of hands-on experience researching and testing supplements, he brings a practical, no-BS approach to supplement analysis. His mission: help people make informed decisions without falling for marketing hype.

supplement analysisindustry researchconsumer advocacystack optimization

5+ years of supplement industry experience

Our Editorial Process

1

Research & Analysis

Our team researches topics using the most comprehensive clinical databases available. We prioritize meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and systematic reviews from established medical literature.

2

Content Creation

Content is written by team members with expertise in nutrition, biochemistry, and health communications. We translate complex research into accessible guidance without sacrificing accuracy.

3

Expert Review

All content involving health claims, dosing recommendations, or potential interactions is reviewed for scientific accuracy by our advisory board before publication.

4

Publication & Updates

Published content includes clear attribution and review dates. We conduct regular reviews to update information based on emerging research.

Content Team

Our writers and researchers bring backgrounds in nutritional sciences, public health, and health communications.

Sarah Chen
Sarah Chen
Lead Health Writer
MS Nutritional SciencesHealth Communications Specialist

Lead Writer with MS in Nutritional Sciences

Marcus Reid
Marcus Reid
Research Director
MPH EpidemiologyBS Biochemistry

Research Director with MPH in Epidemiology

Emma Torres
Emma Torres
Senior Science Writer
MS Nutrition & DieteticsRDN Candidate

Science Writer with MS in Nutrition & Dietetics

Scientific Advisory

Scientific Advisory Board

Our content is reviewed by independent scientific advisors with expertise in pharmacology and nutrition science. These advisors ensure our information aligns with current peer-reviewed research and established scientific standards. They do not provide medical advice and their involvement represents scientific accuracy review only.

Note: Scientific advisors provide guidance on accuracy and methodology. Their involvement does not constitute medical advice or personal health recommendations.

Our Data Sources

Check Supplement pulls from the most comprehensive and authoritative sources available. Our analysis combines primary government databases with specialized research tools to ensure you get accurate, up-to-date information.

Primary Clinical Sources

PubMed / NIH

The world's largest database of peer-reviewed medical research. Home to over 36 million citations from biomedical literature.

FDA / OpenFDA

Official U.S. Food & Drug Administration data including adverse event reports, safety alerts, and regulatory information.

Specialized Research Databases

Beyond public sources, we utilize highly specialized databases focused on supplement science, drug-nutrient interactions, and clinical dosing data. These curated resources allow us to provide depth of analysis that goes beyond what's available through standard searches.

Clinical Trials
Dosing Research
Interaction Data
Safety Analysis
Nutrient Content
Product Analysis
Bioavailability
Form Efficacy

Scoring Methodology

Our ingredient and product scores combine evidence quality with practical value. Here's how we weight the factors:

Evidence Quality40%

Based on the strength of clinical evidence: meta-analyses and systematic reviews score highest, followed by RCTs, then observational studies.

Real-World Applicability30%

How broadly relevant is this supplement? Addressing common deficiencies (like Vitamin D or Magnesium) scores higher than niche applications.

Safety Profile30%

Considers reported side effects, drug interactions, and contraindications based on FDA data and clinical literature.

The Deficit Baseline: We recognize that 70%+ of people are deficient in certain nutrients (Magnesium, Vitamin D, Omega-3s). Supplements addressing widespread deficiencies get appropriate recognition for their population-level impact.

What We Don't Do

Accept payment for reviews

Our editorial content and scores are independent of any manufacturer.

Make unsubstantiated claims

Every claim is grounded in peer-reviewed research and cited sources.

Provide medical diagnosis or treatment

We provide educational information, not medical advice. Always consult a healthcare provider.

Disclosures

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and is not intended as medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider before starting any supplement regimen, especially if you have medical conditions or take medications. Check Supplement does not endorse any specific products.

FTC Disclosure

Check Supplement may earn affiliate commissions from qualifying purchases. This does not influence our editorial content or scoring methodology. Our reviews are based solely on scientific evidence and our independent evaluation criteria.

Questions or Corrections?

We take accuracy seriously. If you spot an error or have questions about our editorial process, please reach out:

Contact Editorial Team